俄汉政治话语腐败概念隐喻模式探究  

A Study on the Russian and Chinese Conceptual Metaphor Models of Corruption in Political Discourse

作　　者：孙淑芳 孙福庆 Sun Shu-fang;Sun Fu-qing(Center for Russian Language, Literature and Culture Studies of Heilongjiang University, Harbin 150080, China)

机构地区：[1]黑龙江大学俄罗斯语言文学与文化研究中心,哈尔滨150080

出　　处：《外语学刊》2019年第2期56-63,共8页Foreign Language Research

基　　金：黑龙江大学对俄问题研究专项项目"中俄政治话语比较研究"(DEZ1804);黑龙江省高等学校哲学社会科学学术创新团队"俄语语言学创新研究"(TD201201)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：近年来,政治语言学作为一门新兴的交叉学科引起学界的广泛关注。政治隐喻是政治语言学的主要研究对象之一,是隐喻思维对政治现实进行概念化和范畴化的重要工具,同时也是透视文化独特性的棱镜,政治隐喻研究对了解政治家们的治国之道和文化理念具有重要的学术价值。本文以政治话语与政治隐喻概念阐释为切入点,以概念隐喻理论为支撑,以政治话语腐败概念隐喻模式为分析对象,选取2012—2014年度中俄两国媒体有关腐败主题的报道,自建小型语料库,同时运用定量与定性分析相结合的方法,从认知和文化视角阐释俄汉语腐败概念隐喻模式异同的深层原因,旨在揭示它们的共性与差异特征。In recent years, Political Linguistics has attracted wide attention from academic circles as a new interdisciplinary discipline. Political metaphor is one of the main research objects of Political Linguistics. It is an important tool for metaphorical thinking to conceptualize and categorize political realities. At the same time, it is also a prism for reflecting the cultural uniqueness. The study of political metaphor has important academic value for understanding politicians’ ideas and cultural concepts. Beginning with the explanation of political discourse and political metaphor, and based on Conceptual Metaphor Theory, this paper focuses on conceptual metaphor models of corruption in political discourse. We select reports on corruption from the Chinese and Russian media in 2012-2014, build a small corpus, use the methods of quantitative analysis and qualitative analysis, and try to explain the similarities and differences between Russian and Chinese conceptual metaphor models of corruption from cognitive and cultural perspectives.

关 键 词：政治话语 政治隐喻 腐败概念 隐喻模式 政治语言学 

分 类 号：H005[语言文字—语言学]