阴道分泌物五联检法检测的临床应用研究  

The clinical application research of five joint inspection method to vaginal secretions

作　　者：周巍[1] 牛瑞兵[1] 赵爱莲 ZhouWei;Niu Ruibing;Zhao Ailian(Department of Clinical Laboratory,Erdos Center Hospital,Erods,Inner Mongolia,017000,China)

机构地区：[1]内蒙古鄂尔多斯市中心医院检验科,内蒙古鄂尔多斯017000

出　　处：《当代医学》2019年第11期14-15,共2页Contemporary Medicine

摘　　要：目的探讨五联检法在阴道分泌物检测中的临床应用价值。方法收集2017年3月至2017年9月来鄂尔多斯市中心医院妇产科门诊就诊的阴道炎患者标本1235例,用五联检法进行检测,同时用显微镜法进行对比分析。结果五联检法对真菌性阴道炎及滴虫性阴道炎的阳性检出率低于显微镜法,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);而五联检法对乳酸杆菌、白细胞、细菌性阴道病的阳性检出率略高于显微镜法,差异无统计学意义。在清洁度判断结果方面两者表现出较好的一致性。结论阴道分泌物五联检法作为一种新型检测方法,在辅助诊断细菌性阴道病方面具有明显优势。但其对真菌及滴虫检出率低于显微镜法,需要两者结合提高检出率,为临床疾病诊断的准确性提供有效保证。Objective To investigate the clinical value of five joint inspection method in detection of vaginal secretions.Methods The 1 235 samples were collected from March 2017 to September 2017 in patients with vaginitis of Erdos Central Hospital obstetrics and gynecology clinic.The cases were detected by comparing five joint inspection method and microscope method.Results The positive detection rate of five joint inspection method in fungal vaginitis and trichomonas vaginitis is lower than the microscope method,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05);in lactic acid bacteria and white blood cells,bacterial vaginosis positive rate is slightly higher than the microscope method,but the difference was not statistically significant.Both of them have good consistency in the results of cleanliness judgment.Conclusion Vaginal secretions five joint inspection method as a new detection method has obvious advantages in the diagnosis of bacterial vaginal disease.However,the detection rate of fungi and Trichomonas is lower than that of microscope,which needs to be combined to improve the detection rate and make effective guarantee for the accuracy of clinical diagnosis of disease.

关 键 词：阴道分泌物 五联检法 显微镜法 对比分析 临床应用 

分 类 号：R711.31[医药卫生—妇产科学]