界权论:关于环境法的另一种解释  

Redefining the Right:A New Explanation of Environmental Law

作　　者：梁忠[1,2] LIANG Zhong

机构地区：[1]北京大学法学院 [2]北京大学资源能源与环境法研究中心

出　　处：《中国地质大学学报（社会科学版）》2019年第2期23-34,共12页Journal of China University of Geosciences(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家留学基金委"建设高水平大学公派研究生项目"(201806010198);国家重点研发计划课题"排污许可法律体系与立法方案研究"(2016YFC0208402);国家社科基金一般项目"我国环保产业发展的制度困境与法律对策研究"(16BFX147)

摘　　要：自然为人类提供的利益可分为经济性利益与生态性利益。自然的经济性利益易于分割,已转化为法律上的财产权利。而自然的生态性利益是一种整体性、保障性的利益,无法转化为具体的法律权利。生态性利益的保护是财产权利存在的前提,保护自然因此构成财产权利的内在要求。界权论主张环境法本质上是对现有财产权利体系进行重新界定之法,通过将生态要素注入现有财产权利体系,调整现有权利边界,使自然的经济性利益与生态性利益之间实现平衡。从界权论的视角出发,可以对环境法的立法目的、调整对象、调整手段、环境法与其他部门法的关系等现象进行新的解读。Environmental interest can be divided into economic interest and ecological interest.The economic interest of the environment is easily segregated and has been translated into property rights.The ecological interest of the environment is a kind of Holistic and safeguarding interest,which can not be transformed into specific legal rights.The protection of the ecological interest of environment is the prerequisite for the existence of property rights.Therefore,the protection of the environment is an inherent requirement of property rights.The theory of redefining the right advocates that environmental law essentially redefines the existing system of property rights by injecting ecological elements into the existing property rights system and adjusting the boundaries of existing rights so that the economic and ecological interests of the environment are balanced.From the perspective of the theory of redefining the boundaries of rights,we can systematically explain the legislative purpose,the object of adjustment and the means of adjustment of environmental law.We also can systematically explain the relationship between environmental law and other sectoral laws.

关 键 词：环境权 环境义务 界权论 财产权 

分 类 号：D612.601[政治法律—政治学]