装备制造业的产能利用率:程度测算与差异分析  

Capacity Utilization of Equipment Manufacturing Industry:Degree and Difference Analysis

作　　者：葛鹏飞[1] 黄秀路[2] 王泽润 Ge Pengfei;Huang Xiulu;Wang Zerun(School of Economics and Management,Northwest University,Xi'an 710127,China;Jinhe Center for Economic Research,Xi'an Jiaotong University,Xi'an 710049,China)

机构地区：[1]西北大学经济管理学院,陕西西安710127 [2]西安交通大学金禾经济研究中心,陕西西安710049

出　　处：《中国科技论坛》2019年第4期78-83,共6页Forum on Science and Technology in China

基　　金：西北大学研究生自主创新项目(YZZ17012)

摘　　要：基于2001—2015年分省分行业的3060个样本,运用DSBM模型考察装备制造业产能利用率的时空演变。研究发现,装备制造业产能利用率在样本时间内为74. 17%,整体上不存在产能过剩;东、中、西部分别为76. 40%、63. 53%、66. 44%,东部无产能过剩,中部和西部产能过剩严重;装备制造业产能利用率的时间演变与宏观经济走势相吻合,具有明显的顺周期特征,东部受2008年全球金融危机影响严重,中西部则在经济进入新常态后下降明显。装备制造业产能利用率的整体差距主要源于各子行业间的差异,其本质是地区过剩与行业过剩的交叉结果。This paper uses DSBM model to investigate the temporal and spatial evolution of productivity utilization in equipment manufacturing industry.It shows that the utilization ratio is 74.17% in the sample time,and no overcapacity is vitnessed on the whole.Specifically,utilization in the east,middle and west is 76.40%,63.53% and 66.44% respectively,indicating that the east has no overcapacity while the middle and west suffer from serious overcapacity.Evolution of utilization in the equipment manufacturing industry coincides with the macroeconomic trend.There is obvious pro-cyclical characteristics,with the east the most seriously affected by the global financial crisis in 2008,and the midwest significantly declining after the “new normal ”.The overall disparity of the utilization in the equipment manufacturing industry mainly owns to the differences among the sub-industries,and its essence is the cross result of regional surplus and industry surplus.

关 键 词：装备制造业 产能利用率 产能过剩 DSBM模型 

分 类 号：F424[经济管理—产业经济]