检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周伟[1] 徐境阳 雷华[1] 周钰[1] Zhou Wei;XU jingyang;LEI Hua;ZHOU Yu(Department of Acupuncture and Massage, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830054, China)
机构地区:[1]新疆医科大学第一附属医院针灸推拿科,乌鲁木齐830054
出 处:《新疆医科大学学报》2019年第4期537-540,共4页Journal of Xinjiang Medical University
基 金:新疆维吾尔自治区卫生与健康适宜技术推广项目(SYTG-201872)
摘 要:目的探究小针刀松解神经根外口对臀上皮神经损伤的临床疗效。方法选择2016年5月-2018年5月在新疆医科大学第一附属医院针灸推拿科收治的臀上皮神经损伤患者60例为研究对象,按就诊先后顺序随机分为对照组(30例)和治疗组(30例)。对照组患者选取三焦俞、肾俞、气海俞、环跳、秩边、居髎、承扶、委中、风市及阿是穴电针治疗后行推拿治疗,2项治疗每天1次,连续5 d为1个疗程。治疗组患者采用针刀治疗,定点:腰1-腰3患侧神经根外口体表投映点及腰1-腰4棘突间隙6个点为进针刀点。治疗组1次为1个疗程。以上2组患者治疗1个疗程后,比较两组患者治疗前后VAS评分和疗效。结果与治疗前2组患者VAS评分比较,2组患者治疗后VAS评分均降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。与对照组患者治疗后VAS评分(3.89±1.52)分比较,治疗组患者治疗后VAS评分(1.47±1.06)分降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。2组患者治疗后,治疗组患者总有效率(83.33%)高于对照组患者总有效率(56.67%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论小针刀松解神经根外口对臀上皮神经损伤具有良好的治疗效果。Objective To explore the clinical effect of small needle knife release of the external orifice of nerve root on gluteal epithelial nerve injury. Methods 60 patients with gluteal epithelial nerve injury admitted to the department of Acupuncture, Massage and Moxibustion of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from May 2016 to May 2018 were randomly divided into control group(30 cases) and treatment group(30 cases). The patients in the control group were treated with massage once a day for 5 consecutive days after electro-acupuncture at Sanjiao Yu, Shenshu, Qihai Yu, Huanjuan, Ranbian, Juqiao, Chengfu, Weizhong, Fengshi and Ashi points. The patients in the treatment group were treated with needle-knife therapy. The needle-knife points were the projection points of the external orifice of the nerve root on the affected side of L1-L3 and the 6 points of the space between L1-L4 spinous processes. The treatment group was treated once as a course of treatment. After one course of treatment, VAS scores and curative effects of the two groups were compared before and after treatment. Results Compared with the VAS scores of the two groups before treatment, the VAS scores of the two groups after treatment were lower significantly(P<0.05). Compared with the VAS score of the control group(3.89±1.52) after treatment, the VAS score of the treatment group(1.47±1.06) after treatment was decreased significantly(P<0.05). After treatment, the total effective rate in the treatment group(83.33%) was higher than that in the control group(56.67%) significantly(P<0.05). Conclusion The small needle knife has a good therapeutic effect on gluteal epithelial nerve injury by releasing the external orifice of nerve root.
分 类 号:R246[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15