检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张武军[1] 张唯玮 郭宁宁 Zhang Wujun;Zhang Weiwei;GuoNingning(School of Humanities and Social Science,University of Science and Technology Beijing 100083,China)
出 处:《科技进步与对策》2019年第7期131-137,共7页Science & Technology Progress and Policy
基 金:中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(FRF-BR-17-006B)
摘 要:标准必要专利在标准与专利的整合中应运而生并提升了知识经济效能。但是,专利标准化的同时也扩大了专利权人在相关市场的支配力,很容易产生专利权滥用行为,如不公平高价许可、不合理搭售、无正当理由要求反向许可等。以标准必要专利权人滥用市场支配地位为切入点,以高通案为例,分析标准必要专利权人滥用市场支配地位的反垄断问题,针对反垄断法体系,从立法与执法两个方面提出政策建议,为涉及标准必要专利的反垄断行政执法和反垄断诉讼提供借鉴。Stand essential patents(SEP)are born in the process of standard and patent integration, and SEP enhances the performance of knowledge integration. However, the patent standardization expands the power of patentee in the relevant market,and it is prone to the abuse of rights raised by the patentee. This paper analyzes the definition of the relevant market, dominant position in the market and abuses of market dominance. Due to the late start, China has an incomplete anti-monopoly system, of which relevant concepts about patent are not accurate, analysis of the relevant market are not comprehensive and the standard calculation of penalty is also deficient. In addition, due to the lack of professional law enforcement officials, China's anti-monopoly law enforcement has been limited. Through the analysis of the above problems, this paper puts forward some suggestions on the improvement of China's anti-monopoly law system from two aspects of legislation and enforcement.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.115.20