检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:M. M. Sharma
机构地区:[1]Indian Corporate Law Firm,Vaish Associates,Advocates [2]The Competition Commission of India [3]Delhi High Court [4]Kings College (London)
出 处:《US-China Law Review》2019年第2期77-81,共5页美中法律评论(英文版)
摘 要:Competition Law is relatively of nascent origin in India. There have been some cases of conflict of jurisdiction between sector specific regulators and CCI, particularly, in relation to enforcement of intellectual property rights, which has attracted judicial intervention by writ courts. The higher judiciary in India has played a significant role in resolving this conflict and the issue of conflict of jurisdiction or “forum shopping” is likely to continue to arise in India. However, some recent judgements of the Supreme Courts seem to have been resolved the issue to large extent in India. The article outlines the role of higher judiciary in resolving this source of conflict during the enforcement of the competition law in the last nine years and how it has helped in developing a robust jurisprudence on competition law in India.
关 键 词:WRIT JURISDICTION jurisdictional issue COMPETITION sectoral OVERLAP
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.227