检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:应松年[1] YING Song-nian(China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing, 100088)
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学
出 处:《行政法学研究》2019年第2期3-10,共8页ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW
摘 要:行政复议制度是我国行政纠纷解决体系的重要组成部分,具有高效、低成本、和谐等优点。但是,我国现行的复议制度也存在着性质与功能定位不全面、公正性不足、管辖过于分散、和解与调解手段运用不畅等问题,这造成了我国纠纷解决体系构建畸形、复议制度权威性受到质疑的窘境。值此《行政复议法》修订之际,应当对这些问题有一个充分、全面的考虑。只有这样,行政复议制度才能长出牙齿、形成威慑、提高老百姓对该制度的信任感,进而使行政复议真正成为化解行政争议的主渠道。The administrative review system is an important part of administrative dispute resolution system in China, which is mainly featured in high efficiency, low costs and harmony. However, there are some issues in the existing review system in China including incomplete nature and functional orientation, insufficient impartiality, scattered jurisdiction, and poor application of reconciliation and mediation methods, which result in the unhealthy structure of dispute resolution system and the awkward situation that the authority of review system is questioned. On the occasion of the amendments of Administrative Review Law, full and comprehensive considerations should be given to these issues. Only in this way can the authority of review system be reshaped to enhance people's trust in the system so that administrative review can truly become a major channel to resolve administrative disputes.
分 类 号:D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.141.199.214