检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:焦国伟[1] 冯严超 Jiao Guowei;Feng Yanchao(School of Economics, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China;School of Economics and Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China)
机构地区:[1]吉林大学经济学院,长春130012 [2]哈尔滨工业大学经济与管理学院,哈尔滨150001
出 处:《工业技术经济》2019年第5期143-151,共9页Journal of Industrial Technological Economics
摘 要:本文基于空间视角,选取2003~2017年中国285个地级及以上城市的面板数据,通过设置3种空间计量模型,探讨了环境规制对中国城市生态效率的影响。实证结果显示:(1)环境规制对中国城市生态效率的影响存在倒"U"型曲线关系,且在不同城市之间存在明显的负向空间溢出效应;(2)东部样本、西部样本与中部样本空间溢出效应的强度依次递减,不同区域之间存在明显的空间异质性;(3)金融信贷对中国城市生态效率有显著的促进作用,政府干预对中国城市生态效率有显著的抑制作用,而人力资本对中国城市生态效率的影响具有不确定性。Based on the perspective of spatial economics, we adopt three spatial econometric models to gauge the impact of environmental regulation on the urban eco-efficiency in China through the panel data of 285 prefecture level cities and above from 2003 to 2017. The empirical results show that, firstly, thereisaninverted “U”-shaped curve relationship about the impact of environmental regulation on urban eco-efficiency in China, and there are significant and negative spatial spillover effects among diffe rent cities. Secondly, eastern sample, western sample, and central sample s spatial spillover effects are successively decreasing, and there also exists significant spatial heterogeneity among different regions. Financial credits have a significant role in promoting urban eco-efficiency in China, and government intervention has a significant inhibitory effect on urban eco-efficiency in China. However, the impact of human capital on urban eco-efficiency in China is uncertain.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117