关于上古汉语-r韵尾构拟的汉语文献证据的再检讨  

A re-examination of the reconstruction of ~*-r ending in Old Chinese with textual evidence

作　　者：王弘治[1,2] WANG Hongzhi

机构地区：[1]上海师范大学语言研究所 [2]华盛顿大学亚洲语文系

出　　处：《中国语文》2019年第2期182-191,255,共11页Studies of the Chinese Language

摘　　要：Baxter和Sagart(2014)接受了斯塔罗斯金(1989)中~*-r韵尾的构拟,形成了上古韵部的锐音韵尾的四分格局:~*-j,~*-t,~*-n,~*-r。近来Hill(2014)、List(2016)从不同的论证角度证明这一构拟的合理性,然而这两篇论文所采信的汉语证据主要依赖于白一平、沙加尔构拟的上古音。我们认为,有必要从上古汉语的实证材料出发,依照白一平、沙加尔构拟的逻辑,对他们的构拟结果进行验证。这些实证材料主要包括:后汉梵汉对音、汉代的诗文押韵及出土古文字材料。验证的结果显示,白一平、沙加尔的构拟在上古晚期的材料当中并没有得到正面支持。Based on Starostin(1989)s reconstruction of a*-r ending,Baxter&Sagart(2014)created a new phonological system of four acute consonantal endings:*-j,*-t,*-n,and*-r.This new system was supported by Hill(2014)and List(2016)from various perspectives,but their evidence is dependent upon the Old Chinese phonology reconstructed by Baxter&Sagart(2014)without proper testing on its reasonability.This paper suggests that it is necessary to verify the linguistic data in Baxter&Sagart(2014)s study by Indic-Chinese transcriptions,rhyming examples from the Han period and paleographic data from excavated texts,and shows that the reconstruction of a*-r ending does not receive positive support from these materials.

关 键 词：上古汉语构拟 *-r韵尾 

分 类 号：H111[语言文字—汉语]