论WTO《补贴与反补贴措施协定》中“公共机构”的认定——以DSB案件对“国有企业”的认定为视角  

Research On Determination of Public Body of SCMA——From the Perspective of State-Owned Enterprise in DSB Cases

作　　者：刘瑛[1] 陈佳婧 LIU Ying;CHEN Jia-jing(Institute of International Law, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China;School of International Education, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430070, China)

机构地区：[1]武汉大学国际法研究所,湖北武汉430072 [2]武汉大学国际教育学院,湖北武汉430070

出　　处：《太原师范学院学报（社会科学版）》2019年第1期61-69,共9页Journal of Taiyuan Normal University:Social Science Edition

摘　　要：WTO《补贴与反补贴措施协定》定义的补贴主体是政府或公共机构,但《补贴与反补贴措施协定》没有明确定义"公共机构"或作具体归类,令中国的"国有企业"定性成为问题。结合WTO争端解决机构的案例剖析"国有企业"认定存在的问题,可以发现仅讨论国有企业和公共机构的关系来认定是否存在补贴是不充分的,是否存在政府职能及政府职能与财政资助、授予利益两者关系的判断才是判断是否存在补贴的正解。Body of subsidies defined by the SCMA is the government or public institutions. However, SCMA does not clearly define “public institutions” or make specific classifications. This paper analyzes issues existing in the identification of “state-owned enterprises” in DSB cases. It points out that it is not sufficient to discuss the relationship between state-owned enterprises and public institutions in subsidy determination, but to further determine whether there is performed government function, the relationship between government functions and financial support, and granting benefits.

关 键 词：世界贸易组织 反补贴 公共机构 国有企业 

分 类 号：DF974[政治法律—国际法学]