检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈宏[1] CHEN Hong(Southwest University for Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120)
机构地区:[1]西南政法大学,重庆401120
出 处:《汕头大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2019年第1期88-93,96,共7页Journal of Shantou University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)
摘 要:检察机关提起公益诉讼,是对侵害国家和公共利益的违法行为进行法律监督的重要方式,检察机关行使调查权是实现这种法律监督职权的重要手段。作为公益诉讼起诉人,检察机关行使的调查权归根溯源属于当事人证明权内含的证据收集权,是推动实质且充分的诉讼活动从而实现公益诉权的保障。检察机关基于监督目的而补位提起公益诉讼是维护公益的后置救济途径,应当赋予检察机关不同于一般当事人的调查权行使方式和保障措施。Public interest litigation by the procuratorate is a vital means of legal supervision on violations against national and public interest, for which the procuratorate’s power of investigation is a necessity. The power of investigation exercised by the procuratorate can be traced to the plaintiffs’ right to collect evidence which is embedded in the right of proof. Such power is a safeguard for a full and substantial promotion of the litigation and therefore for the right to initiate public interest litigation. For the purpose of supervision, the procuratorate can conduct public interest litigation as a relief to public interest protection. Therefore, the procuratorate should be granted a way to perform and safeguardthe power of investigation different from the way of typical parties.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.17.175