检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵早早[1] 何达基[2] Zhao Zaozao;He Daji
机构地区:[1]中国社会科学院财经战略研究院,副研究员北京100028 [2]美国堪萨斯大学,教授美国66044
出 处:《中国行政管理》2019年第3期118-125,共8页Chinese Public Administration
基 金:财政部委托2018年世界银行贷款"现代财政制度与国家治理"技援项目
摘 要:如果绩效预算改革的目标被单一地确立为增加绩效评价信息对预算决策和预算资金分配结果的影响,那么改革将很难成功。本文构建多层次制度主义框架并指出,未来绩效预算理论的关注点应该转向更广阔的制度和管理层面。中国未来改革需同时重视外部经济、政治和社会等宏观因素以及政府内部组织文化、技术能力、领导人意愿等多重管理因素的影响,均衡地推动改革深化。If the main purpose of performance budget reform is singularly established to increase the impact of performance evaluation information on budget decisions and budgetary fund allocation results, the reform will be difficult to succeed. This paper constructs a multi-layer institutionalism framework and points out that the focus of performance budgeting theory should be shifted to a broader institutional and management level. In the future, when pushing the Budget Performance Management reform, the Chinese government at all levels should pay more attention to the external economic, political and social macro factors as well as the influence of multiple management factors such as the internal organizational culture, technical capabilities, and motivation of leaders. The framework may foster a more balanced approach to deepen the reform effort.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.80