活性焦检测标准的实践与探讨  

Practice and discussion of active coke testing standards

作　　者：解炜 王鹏[1,3,4,5] 傅月梅 盛明 梁大明 刘静 XIE Wei(Coal Chemical Industry Branch,China Coal Research Institute Ltd.,Beijing 100013,China)

机构地区：[1]煤炭科学技术研究院有限公司煤化工分院,北京100013 [2]中国矿业大学(北京)化学与环境工程学院,北京100083 [3]北京市煤基节能环保炭材料重点实验室 [4]煤炭资源高效开采与洁净利用国家重点实验室 [5]国家能源煤炭高效利用与节能减排技术装备重点实验室,北京100013 [6]上海克硫环保科技股份有限公司,上海201203

出　　处：《煤炭加工与综合利用》2019年第3期49-53,56,I0001,共7页Coal Processing & Comprehensive Utilization

基　　金：国家重点研发计划重点专项(2016YFC0204100)

摘　　要：针对活性焦耐压强度、耐磨强度、脱硫值和脱硝率等指标,对比了国标和相关企业检测标准的区别,指出了一些检测过程中容易出现误差的操作;着重探讨了活性焦脱硝值的测定方法,提出了测试设备、检测方法上的优化方案,并且解读了脱硝率测定过程中NO出口浓度变化曲线;建议专业研究机构提供指导,规范操作方式,以期进一步优化活性焦质量评价体系,促进活性焦产业的有序发展。In view of the indexes of active coke,such as compressive resistance,wear resistance,desulfurization value and denitration rate,the differences between national standard and related enterprise standards are compared.And some operations that are quite error prone during the testing process are pointed out.The determination of the denitration value of active coke is mainly discussed.The optimization scheme about the testing equipment and testing methods is proposed,and the curve of the NO outlet concentration during the determination procedure of denitration rate is interpreted.It is recommended that professional research institutes should provide the guidance and standardize the operation modes in order to further optimize the active coke quality evaluation system and promote the orderly development of the active coke industry.

关 键 词：活性焦 指标 检测标准 测定方法 区别 

分 类 号：TQ522.1[化学工程—煤化学工程]