互殴案件中基于正当防卫的不法侵害行为认定研究——基于2762份刑事裁判文书的分析  

Research on Identification of Illegal Infringements Based on Legitimate Defense in Cases of Mutual Beatings——Based on the Analysis of 2762 Criminal Judgment Documents

作　　者：赵威[1] 王译 ZHAO Wei;WANG Yi(l.Law School, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China;Law School, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)

机构地区：[1]南昌大学法学院,江西南昌330031 [2]武汉大学法学院,湖北武汉430072

出　　处：《广西政法管理干部学院学报》2019年第1期85-90,共6页Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law

基　　金：最高人民法院2017年度司法研究重大课题"正当防卫类案案例研究"成果之一

摘　　要：正当防卫之所以成为当下学界探讨之热点,乃因其确认标准与适用范围存在司法认定上的模糊。司法实践中,互殴案件允许存在正当防卫这一论点普遍得到学界认可。然而,在何种情形下当事人可进行无过当防卫,在何种情形下超出了必要限度的防卫行为应如何定罪量刑,在未来的刑事立法完善过程中仍然存在可商榷的空间。基于互殴案件的特定情形,法院应对"不法侵害行为"予以明辨之,方可厘清不法侵害与正当防卫之界限。The reason why legitimate defense has become a hot topic in the current academic circles is the ambiguity of its confirmation standards and scope of application in the judicial recognition. In judicial practice, the viewpoint that the mutual beatings cases allow for proper defense is generally recognized by the academic community. However, under what circumstances the parties can carry out the defense without any defensiveness, and under what circumstances the defensive behavior beyond the necessary limit should be convicted and sentenced, there is still room for discussion in the process of perfecting the future criminal legislation. Based on the specific circumstances of the mutual beatings case, the court should clearly distinguish the "illegal infringements" in order to clarify the boundary between illegal infringement and legitimate defense.

关 键 词：互殴 正当防卫 不法侵害 防卫必要性 

分 类 号：DF611[政治法律—刑法学]