“电力垄断第一案”后的法律思考  

Legal Consideration of "the First Judicial Case of Electric Power Monopoly"

作　　者：张继昕[1,2] ZHANG Jixin(College of Political Science and Law, Taiyuan University of Technology,Taiyuan 030024,China;Shanxi Huaju Law Firm,Taiyuan 030006,China)

机构地区：[1]太原理工大学政法学院,山西太原030024 [2]山西华炬律师事务所,山西太原030006

出　　处：《山西高等学校社会科学学报》2019年第3期48-54,62,共8页Social Sciences Journal of Universities in Shanxi

摘　　要：中国《反垄断法》实施十年,被处罚企业申请听证和行政复议进行救济案件鲜有耳闻。被媒体称作"电力垄断第一案"的"山西电力案"首开先例,案件中涉及的被处罚主体、价格跟随、处罚幅度,及处罚程序等问题值得深入探讨,这些问题较为突出地反映了反垄断法实施过程中需要完善的地方。文章拟结合案情对这些普遍性的法律问题进行细致分析,助于《反垄断法》的完善。In the ten years after the implementation of the Anti-monopoly Law , few cases of applying for hearing and administrative reconsideration for relief by penalized enterprises have been heard."The first case of power monopoly", as was called by the media, was the first case.The subject of punishment, price follow-up, punishment range, and punishment procedure involved in the case deserve further discussion, because these problems highlight the need for improvement in the implementation of the anti-monopoly law. This paper intends to make a detailed analysis of these universal legal issues in the light of the circumstances of the case, hoping to be helpful to the perfection of the Anti-monopoly Law .

关 键 词：被处罚主体 价格跟随 处罚适度 处罚程序 

分 类 号：D922.294[政治法律—经济法学]