我国审级制度问题研究——探索刑事案件有限三审终审制度  

Research on the Trial Level System in Our Country: Exploring a Limited System of the Third Instance as the Final for Criminal Cases

作　　者：徐敏[1] Xu Min

机构地区：[1]安徽大学,安徽合肥230601

出　　处：《科教文汇》2019年第12期54-56,共3页Journal of Science and Education

摘　　要：我国实行的是四级两审终审制度,这与我国幅员辽阔、地缘关系复杂等基本国情息息相关,但是在司法实践中,有些案件因其特殊性实际上是一审终审或者三审终审。对我国现行刑事两审制进行适当的改造,建立刑事案件有限三审终审制度,能更大限度地实现公平与正义。我国再审程序掩盖了对三审程序的需求和再审程序无限性特点的弊端,以及近年来巡回法庭制度的发展,都为刑事案件有限三审制度的建立提供了可能。China implements the second instance as the final based on four levels, which is closely related to China's basic national conditions of a vast territory and complex geographical relations. However, the first instance as the final or the third instance as the final is actually applied to some cases in judicial practice because of their particularity. Appropriate transformation of the current criminal two-trial system in China and the establishment of a limited system of the third trial as the final for criminal cases can achieve greater fairness and justice. China's retrial procedure masks the need of the third-instance procedure and the shortcomings of the infinite nature of the retrial procedure. Besides, the circuit court system is developing in recent years, which provides the possibility of establishing a limited system of the third instance as the final for criminal cases.

关 键 词：审级制度 三审终审 巡回法庭 可行性 

分 类 号：G642[文化科学—高等教育学]