不同烤烟品种中部叶主要品质性状差异分析  

Variation Analysis of Main Quality Traits on Middle Leaves of Different Flue-cured Tobacco Varieties

作　　者：范幸龙[1] 周子方[1] 张建强 胡钟胜[1] 杨康 陈尚上 骆海明 吴克春[2] 蒋朝臣 杜灵 明峰[1] 杜坚[1] FAN Xinglong;ZHOU Zifang;ZHANG Jianqiang;HU Zhongsheng;YANG Kang;CHEN Shangshang;LUO Haiming;WU Kechun;JIANG Chaochen;DU Ling;MING Feng;DU Jian(China Tobacco Jiangsu Industrial Co., Ltd., Nanjing 210019, China;Lijiang Branch of Yunnan Provincial Tobacco Company,Lijiang, Yunnan 674100, China;Yulong Branch of Lijiang City Tobacco Company, Yulong, Yunnan 674100, China;JianchuanBranch of Dali City Tobacco Company, Jianchuan, Yunnan 671300, China)

机构地区：[1]江苏中烟工业有限责任公司,南京210019 [2]云南省烟草公司丽江市分公司,云南丽江674100 [3]丽江市烟草公司玉龙县分公司,云南玉龙674100 [4]大理州烟草公司剑川县分公司,云南剑川671300

出　　处：《中国烟草科学》2019年第2期73-79,共7页Chinese Tobacco Science

基　　金：江苏中烟工业有限责任公司科技项目"基于苏产卷烟品牌需求的滇西基地后备品种资源筛选与评价"(Y040201915);"提升重庆基地烟叶可用性技术研究"(Y040201814);"基于苏产细支烟的豫西基地高香气上部叶开发"(Y040201717)

摘　　要：为掌握不同烤烟品种中部叶主要品质性状的特征差异,运用描述性统计和方差分析法对我国7个烤烟品种(红大、翠碧1号、KRK26、秦烟96、云烟85、NC55、龙江911)的160个中部叶原烟样品进行对比分析。结果表明:(1)7个烤烟品种中部叶外观质量存在显著差异,各品种外观质量总体变异较小,但所有品种中部叶色度以及红大和KRK26烟叶油分均表现为中等程度变异;(2)7个烤烟品种常规化学成分和烟气品质均存在显著差异,所有品种的常规化学成分以及云烟85、秦烟96和龙江911烟气品质均表现为中等程度变异,红大、NC55、翠碧1号和KRK26烟气品质变异较小;(3)云烟85外观质量综合得分最高81.99分、翠碧1号烟气品质综合得分最高64.64分,翠碧1号、云烟85、红大和KRK26中部叶主要品质性状优于龙江911、秦烟96和NC55。In order to understand the variation of main quality traits on middle leaves of different flue-cured tobacco varieties, descriptive statistics and variance analysis were applied to conduct a comparative analysis on 160 raw tobacco samples of the middle leaves of China's seven flue-cured tobacco varieties (Cuibi 1, Honghuadajinyuan, KRK26, Qinyan 96, Yunyan 85, NC55, Longjiang 911). The results showed that:(1) there was significant difference in the appearance quality of the middle leaves from the seven flue-cured tobacco varieties, and the overall variation of the appearance quality of the seven flue-cured tobacco varieties was relatively small. However, both the colors of the middle leaves from the seven varieties after modulation and the oil content of Hongda and KRK26 tobacco showed moderate variation;(2) There was significant difference in the conventional chemical constituents as well as smoke quality among the seven flue-cured tobacco varieties. The chemical constituents of all the varieties and smoke quality of Yunyan 85, Qinyan 96, and Longjiang 911 were all of moderate variation. The variation of smoke quality of Hongda, NC55, Cuibi 1, and KRK26 was small;(3) Yunyan 85 ranked first in the appearance quality, whose comprehensive score was 81.99;Cuibi 1 ranked first in smokequality, whose comprehensive score was 64.64;the main quality traits of the middle leaves from Cuibi 1, Yunyan 85, Hongda, and KRK26 were superior to those of Longjiang 911, Qinyan 96, and NC55.

关 键 词：烤烟 品种 中部叶 外观质量 化学成分 烟气品质 量化分析 

分 类 号：TS411[农业科学—烟草工业]