中国著作权法立法论与解释论  

The Next Move of Copyright Law in China

作　　者：熊琦[1] Xiong Qi

机构地区：[1]华中科技大学法学院

出　　处：《知识产权》2019年第4期3-18,共16页Intellectual Property

摘　　要：虽然基于各种数据都能得出著作权法学研究已成为"显学"的结论,但在版权产业模式日趋复杂化的今天,著作权法在立法论和解释论上都面临着深层次的新问题,致使相关方在诸多法律概念解释和制度价值认知上缺乏基本共识,立法和司法层面的相关讨论难以展开。这意味着我国著作权法无法如民法和刑法一般基本进入解释论的时代,而需要在立法论和解释论两个层面同时推进。在立法论层面应从单纯的规则借鉴进入到对制度价值、制度绩效、制度执行全方面的深层次比较,为著作权法研究上的方法论自觉和研究范式形成提供理论支持。在解释论层面应全面构建以尊重既有规则和基本法理为基础的著作权法教义学范式,把补充不完全规则的推理建立在穷尽体系解释和类推适用的基础上,避免法官自行定义个案中的实质正义,保证法官造法的结论和引入的域外司法经验符合本土既有规则体系的解释结果。Copyright Law research is gaining an all-time edge in China. However, with the copyright industry becoming increasingly complicated, the Copyright Law is facing new and profound problems in terms of both legislation and interpretation. Therefore, consensus cannot be achieved due to fundamental disagreements on basic copyright concepts, and verdicts for similar cases are different by different courts. In response, copyright legislation and interpretation thereof should be both corrected. On legislation level, comparative research should focus on how copyright rules are created and how they react to the copyright industry. On legal interpretation level, it is suggested to comprehensively construct the Copyright Law doctrinal paradigm upon the established rules and basic legal theory, close legal loopholes on the basis of exhausting systematic legal interpretation and analogy application, avoid granting judges the power to freely define substantial justice, and guarantee the judge-made law and cited foreign judicial experiences to comply with the domestic legal rules and the interpretation thereof.

关 键 词：著作权法 比较法 立法论 解释论 法教义学 

分 类 号：D923.41[政治法律—民商法学]