检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:向光富[1] 卫绪华[2] Xiang Guangfu;Wei Xuhua
出 处:《知识产权》2019年第4期71-78,共8页Intellectual Property
摘 要:文化产品评判中可能包括了单个文化产品、部分文化产品、全部文化产品的三种评判悖论。基于不同的预设,对这三种悖论能否兼容的回答并不相同。在厘清这些不同预设的过程中,著作权法秩序下文化产业所预设的认识论、体制与产权制度、评判秩序也得以发现,因而,在著作权法秩序下苛求在商业电影中解决前两种悖论,是评判秩序的错位。为发挥著作权制度的优势,以及应对著作权保护文化产业的模式被绝对化及制度失灵的问题,我国应当对文化产品进行更精确的分类,厘清适合不同文化产品的商业模式、产权制度、评判标准。The evaluation of cultural products may include three kinds of paradoxes: a single product, a group of products and all products. To answer the question whether these paradoxes can compatible or not, different presuppositions may lead to different answers. In the process of clarifying these different presuppositions, the epistemology, system and property right system and judging order presupposed by cultural industry under the order of Copyright Law can also be found. Therefore, under the order of Copyright Law, it is a misplacement of judging order to seek solutions to the first two paradoxes in commercial movies. In order to make full use the positive effect of the Copyright Law and deal with the problem of absolutization of copyright protection model and system failure, China should classify cultural products more accurately, and clarify the business models, property rights system and evaluation criteria suitable for different cultural products.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28