《四库全书总目》儒家类存目书提要辨正——兼论存目书提要与著录书提要之差异  

Revision of the Confucian Bibliography in the Overall Catalogue of Complete Library in the Four Branches of Literature:On the Differences between Depository Catalogue and Descriptive Catalogue

作　　者：张宗友 ZHANG Zong-you(Institute of Classical Literature,Nanjing University,Nanjing 210023,China)

机构地区：[1]南京大学古典文献研究所,江苏南京210023

出　　处：《徐州工程学院学报（社会科学版）》2019年第3期71-78,共8页Journal of Xuzhou Institute of Technology：Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目"朱彝尊论学诗研究"(17BZW118)

摘　　要：《四库全书总目》集古代目录之大成,其提要可分为著录书提要与存目书提要,二者之间存在不少差异。由儒家类存目书提要可以看出,其讹误主要集中在图书信息、作者信息及图书内容的客观介绍上;同著录书提要相比,存目书提要在内容上缺少著述旨趣及学术得失的主观品评,在文字上体现为较为简短。造成这种差异的原因,在于四库馆臣所费心力不同;而其根源,则在于清高宗弘历纂修《全书》的指导思想,即为了树立本朝文化正统、构建极权帝国的文献体系,而对天下图书进行甄别处理,有应刊、应抄、应存、应删的分别;两类提要之间的差别,正是"寓禁于征,寓毁于修"之策略在《总目》编撰方面的具体体现。The Overall Catalogue of Complete Library in the Four Branches of Literature is a collection of ancient catalogues,which can be divided into two different kinds:depository catalogue and descriptive catalogue.As can be seen from the Confucian bibliography that the depository catalogue errors mainly focus on the objective introduction of book information,author information and book content,lacking of the subjective evaluation of writing purpose and academic gains or losses compared with the descriptive catalogue.One of the reasons for the differences may be due to the different efforts of the librarians,but the root lies in the compilatory thought of the Emperor Gaozong of Qing Dynasty,who,in order to establish the cultural orthodoxy and document system of the totalitarian Empire,selects and divides the overall books into different types of either being published,copied,saved or deleted,which is well reflected his compilatory strategies of "requisition rather than forbidden,compilation rather than destruction".

关 键 词：《四库全书总目》 著录书提要 存目书提要 

分 类 号：I209[文学—中国文学]