明初《五经大全》传注取材新探——兼论纂修群体构成  

Annotation Source of Wu Jing Da Quanin Early Ming Dynasty-Both on Formation of Compilation Team

作　　者：李晓明 LI Xiao-ming(Editorial and Research Center of Confucian Canon, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China;College ofHistory and Culture,Inner Mongolia Normal University,Hohhot010022,China)

机构地区：[1]北京大学<儒藏>编纂与研究中心,北京100871 [2]内蒙古师范大学历史文化学院,呼和浩特010022

出　　处：《安徽师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2019年第3期149-157,共9页Journal of Anhui Normal University(Hum.&Soc.Sci.)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目(17ZDA259)

摘　　要：《五经大全》作为明初官方修纂的重要典籍,其抄录成编的做法历来为学界所诟病。然而传注底本究竟如何选取,鲜有学者涉及。事实上,《大全》选取传注,一方面考虑学术发展的自然法则,另一方面又结合政治因素的综合考量。纂修班子内部,呈现出以江西籍与福建籍翰林职官为主干的群体特征。他们时常同行出游,饮酒诗赋,相为唱和,形成了以地域为纽带的乡邦士人团体,成为明永乐朝历史发展进程中一股重要的政治势力。总而言之,《大全》是明初学术与政治交相呼应、相互影响的综合产物。As an important official classic in the early Ming Dynasty, Wu Jing Da Quan ’s copy behavior has been criticized by academia. However, most scholars rarely touch upon the source of annotation. In fact, the source of Da Quan ’s annotation, which is considering the academic factor on one side;on the other side, there is political factor among the rest. Inside the compilation team, the Hanlin officials who come from Jiangxi and Fujian province occupy absolute majority. They often visited and partied together, accumulated over a long time, becoming a local group based on geographical relation, which proved to be the most significant political force in Yongle period. In a word, Da Quan is a comprehensive result of learning and politics in early Ming Dynasty.

关 键 词：《五经大全》 传注取材 纂修群体 学术裁汰 政治考量 

分 类 号：K248.1[历史地理—历史学]