检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨华[1] 张春涛 YANG Hua;ZHANG Chun-tao(Shanxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanxi Xianyang 712000)
出 处:《按摩与康复医学》2019年第10期12-14,共3页Chinese Manipulation and Rehabilitation Medicine
摘 要:目的:观察儿推开鼻窍法治疗小儿伤风鼻塞的临床疗效。方法:选取2016年9月~2017年10月在陕西中医药大学校医院推拿门诊部收治的具有伤风鼻塞、流涕症状的患儿84例,随机分为推拿组和药物组各42例。儿推组采用儿推开鼻窍法治疗,每日一次,4次为1疗程。药物组采用小儿氨酚黄那敏颗粒口服治疗。3次每日,4日为1疗程。1个疗程结束后,比较临床疗效。结果:推拿组总有效率显著高于药物组(P<0.05)。结论:儿推开鼻窍法治疗小儿鼻塞流涕症的疗效优于药物治疗,且无副作用,值得临床进一步借鉴、推广应用。Objective: To observe the clinical effect of pushing the nasal orifice in the treatment of tetanus nasal obstruction. Methods: From September 2016 to October 2017, 84 cases of children with nasal obstruction and runny symptoms were randomly divided into two groups: massage group(n = 42) and drug group(n = 42).The massage group was treated by pushing nose orifices, once a day, 4 times as a course of treatment. The drug group was treated by oral administration of infantile aminophenol,3 times a day, 4 days as a course of treatment. After one course of treatment, the clinical efficacy was compared. Results: The total effective rate of massage group was significantly higher than that of drug group(P<0.05).Conclusion: It is better to use the nasal orifice in the treatment of children’s nasal obstruction, which is better than the drug treatment, and has no side effects,which is worthy of further reference and application.
分 类 号:R244.1[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229