运输毒品罪罪刑失衡之反思——以实务为视角  

Reflection on the Imbalance of Crime of Transporting Narcotic Drugs and Its Punishment:From the Perspective of Juridical Practice

作　　者：高鹏里 GAO Peng-li(The People's Procuratorate of Yubei District, Chongqing 401120, China)

机构地区：[1]重庆市渝北区人民检察院,重庆401120

出　　处：《贵州警官职业学院学报》2019年第1期38-45,共8页Journal of Guizhou Police Officer Vocational College

摘　　要：我国刑法将社会危害性并不相当的运输毒品罪与走私、贩卖、制造毒品罪设置相同的法定刑,此种立法模式导致运输毒品罪在立法层面的罪刑失衡。实践中,因司法解释对运输毒品罪常见量刑情节的功能配置模糊,导致量刑情节对法定刑的修正机能丧失,进一步加重了罪刑失衡的程度。要平衡运输毒品罪的罪刑关系,从长远来看,应在立法层面修改运输毒品罪的罪名结构及刑罚配置,但其成本较高、周期较长,当务之急是从司法层面合理配置量刑情节对法定刑的修正机能。China’s criminal law set same statutory punishment for those transport, smuggle, traffic in, or manufacture narcotic drugs, but this legislation model has caused the imbalance between the crime and punishment in legislation as the drug transporters aren’t as socially harmful as other kinds of drug criminals. In practice, because the judicial interpretation on common sentencing circumstances of the crime of transporting drugs remains ambiguous, the sentencing circumstances have lost the function in correcting the statutory punishment, thus further aggravating the imbalance between crime and punishment. In a long run, in order to balance the relationship between the crime of transporting drugs and the statutory punishment, the crime structure and punishment allocation of this crime need to be revised through legislation. However, legislation is costly and time-consuming, so it is imperative to allocate the corrective function of sentencing circumstances rationally from judicial aspect.

关 键 词：运输毒品罪 法定刑 量刑情节 罪刑失衡 

分 类 号：D924[政治法律—刑法学]