检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谢东可 Xie Dongke(Pediatric Surgery Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University Luzhou, Sichuan 646000, China)
机构地区:[1]西南医科大学附属医院小儿外科,四川泸州646000
出 处:《医药前沿》2019年第8期24-25,共2页Journal of Frontiers of Medicine
摘 要:目的:观察比较单纯保守治疗和B超引导下穿刺排脓的治疗效果.方法:分析我院收治的病程超过2周的78例小儿阑尾周围脓肿患儿的临床资料,根据治疗方法不同分为单纯保守治疗组与B超引导穿剌治疗组进行对比.结果:B超治疗组患儿病情明显好转,时间短于保守治疗组,两组间时间差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论:对于病史较长的小儿阑尾周围脓肿的治疗应遵循个体化治疗方案,B超引导下脓腔穿刺排脓可达到快速有效治疗的效果.Objective To observe and compare the therapeutic effect of simple conservative treatment and B-ultrasound guided puncture and purulent discharge. Methods The clinical data of 78 children with periappendiceal abscess treated in our hospital for more than 2 weeks were retrospectively analyzed. Result The time of improvement in B-mode ultrasound treatment group was shorter than that in conservative treatment group, and there was significant difference between the two groups [P < 0.05]. Conclusion Puncture and drainage of pus under the guidance of B-mode ultrasound can achieve rapid and effective treatment.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.159.123