跨境电子商务建设视角下个人信息跨境流动的隐私权保护研究  

Study on Privacy Protection in the Cross-border Flow of Personal Information from the Perspective of Cross-border E-commerce Development

作　　者：赵骏[1] 向丽 Zhao Jun;Xiang Li(Guanghua Law School,Zhejiang University,Zhejiang 310008,China)

机构地区：[1]浙江大学光华法学院,浙江杭州310008

出　　处：《浙江大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2019年第2期58-71,共14页Journal of Zhejiang University:Humanities and Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目(17ZDA142);人工智能与法学专项课题;浙江大学文科"双脑计划"交叉创新

摘　　要：全球化的趋势下,经济增长愈发依赖于信息交换,其中个人信息的跨境流动在跨境电子商务发展中日益重要,但也由此引发了对隐私权保护的担忧。不当的规则与政策选择可能形成贸易壁垒,阻遏经济发展。因此,从跨境电商建设视角出发思索中国如何平衡数据流动与隐私保护,具有重要意义。我国应立足于单边、双边、多边等维度建构与完善法律制度,依托政府、企业、个人等多元主体思索实践路径,并坚持综合考量及平衡多重利益。This article illustrates the subtle relationship between the free flow of personal information and the protection of privacy right.To intend to provoke further reflection on the field,it examines the current legal framework of cross-border data flow.Additionally,this article suggests proposals for China to protect privacy well while promoting the development of cross-border e-commerce.The article is mainly divided into the following parts.First,on the relationship between the free flow of personal information and privacy protection,transferring of personal information has a significant influence on an economy.Despite this,it may trigger concerns over privacy protection.Different policies were formulated to protect privacy,but creating obstacles to economic development. Hence,this article focuses on the development of cross-border e-commerce to explore the protection of privacy of personal information in the process of cross-border transferring.Second,through comparing different international,regional and domestic regulations,this article draws conclusions:multilateral legislation has three intrinsic deficiencies.The first deficiency is the divergence in values that augments different paradigms.Currently there are two legislative paradigms:one that emphasizes privacy protection and the other that highlights economic development.Each of them has its particular approach to regulate data flow,which impedes the formation of a widely-accepted international rule.The second deficiency is the imbalance between ″soft law″ and ″hard law″.This will hamper governance by rule of law for inherent defects of both rules.The third deficiency is the possibility that the regulations will have force but lack pertinence,universality and operability.As to domestic laws,they can be classified into three categories,including ″adequate evaluation mode″,″data controller guarantee mode″ and ″data subject consent mode″.Each model has its advantages and disadvantages,represented by the European Union,the United State and C

关 键 词：跨境电商 个人信息跨境流动 隐私权保护 国际规则 国内规则 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]