检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:汪仲启 陈奇星[1] Wang Zhongqi;Chen Qixing
机构地区:[1]上海行政学院,上海200233
出 处:《上海行政学院学报》2019年第2期53-61,共9页The Journal of Shanghai Administration Institute
摘 要:社区自治的实现,除了需要社区有能力自我提供公共产品外,还需要社区有能力对内部纠纷进行在地化解。这意味着,理想的社区自治体系不仅要有公共产品的"生产能力",还要有矛盾纠纷的"消化能力"。社区纠纷的在地消化能力不足,使得一些社区纠纷的解决过程呈现出"闹大"逻辑,从而导致自治困境。"闹大"逻辑的形成,同"权力兜底"的基层纠纷解决机制直接相关,这使得社区内的纠纷往往也需要动员上级权力的直接介入才能最终解决;而"权力兜底"的纠纷解决机制又根源于"政府兜底"的基层治理机制。社会治理的法治化是破解基层纠纷"闹大"逻辑的有效出路。To realize autonomy in a residential community,not only needs the community’s capacity to provide public goods by itself,but also has the possibility to solve the disputes locally.This means that the system of community autonomy should not only have the"pro-ductive capacity"of public goods,but also the"digestion capacity"of contradictions and disputes.Lacking of the"digestion capacity"is the important cause of the dilemma of community autonomy,which leads to difficult to settle the community disputes.As a result,a"power-fi-nal"dispute resolution mechanism will emerge finally.Requiring the"power"to intervene directly in order to resolve the community dis-putes makes the settlement of community disputes are often faced with great uncertainty which we called the non-rational characteristics of the"power-final"dispute resolution mechanism.It is the root cause of the community autonomy dilemma.The rule of law in governance is the effective way to break the"power-final"dispute resolution mechanism at the grassroots level.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3