检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:关翰辉 彭龙 弓贺炜 刘承伟 方炫量[2] GUAN Han-hui;PENG Long;GONG He-wei(Guizhou Provincial Hospital of Orthopaedics, Guiyang 550002, Guizhou;The Sixth Hospital of Ningbo City, Ningbo 315040,Zhejiang)
机构地区:[1]贵州省骨科医院手足显微外科,贵州贵阳550002 [2]宁波市第六医院手外科,浙江宁波315040
出 处:《安徽卫生职业技术学院学报》2019年第2期52-53,共2页Journal of Anhui Health Vocational & Technical College
摘 要:目的:探讨穿支皮瓣修复治疗手外伤软组织缺损的临床价值。方法:抽取手外伤软组织缺损患者总计80例,按照每组40例分为两组,对照组患者使用胸腹带蒂皮瓣修复术治疗,观察组患者则接受穿支皮瓣修复术治疗。结果:观察组患者的病情改善效果明显优于对照组,且不会引发严重的不良反应,治疗效果也得到更多患者的认可(P<0.05)。结论:穿支皮瓣修复治疗能够有效解决手外伤患者的软组织缺损问题,安全性较高,得到较多患者的认可,与传统治疗方法进行比较其应用价值具有明显优势。Objective:To study the clinical value of perforator flap repair in the treatment of soft tissue defects of hand injury. Methods:a total of 80 patients with soft tissue defects of hand injury were selected, and were divided into two groups with 40 patients in each group. One group of patients was treated with chest and abdomen pedicle flap repair and divided into control group. The remaining patients were treated with perforator flap repair and divided into observation group. Results: The improvement of the condition of the patients in the observation group was significantly better than that of the control group, and no serious adverse reactions were caused. The therapeutic effect was also recognized by more patients(P<0.05). Conclusion: The perforator flap repair can effectively solve the soft tissue defect in patients with hand injury, which is safer and more recognized by many patients. Compared with traditional treatment methods, its application value has obvious advantages.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30