职务犯罪调查中的律师介入程序初探  

Research on the Lawyer Intervention in the Crime Investigation Procedure

作　　者：赵晏民 王译 ZHAO YANMIN;WANG YI(School of Law, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430000;National "2011 Plan'' Judicial Civilization Collaborative Innovation Center, Wuhan, Hubei, 430072)

机构地区：[1]武汉大学法学院,湖北武汉430072 [2]国家“2011计划”司法文明协同创新中心,湖北武汉430072

出　　处：《西安电子科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2019年第1期72-79,共8页Journal of Xidian University：Social Science Edition

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目“审判程序违法的类型化处理研究”(17BFX053);国家“2011计划”司法文明协同创新中心资助项目(教技函2013[26])

摘　　要：国家监察体制改革以来,随着监察调查程序的不断完善,律师介入成为监察调查过程中不可回避的问题。但监察调查可因律师介入受阻,更存在职务犯罪嫌疑人因法律帮助逃脱应有制裁之隐患。从程序法定之视角剖析,律师介入监察调查乃为诉讼程序应有之义,不仅可保障被调查人的权利救济渠道,更对监察调查行为形成外部监督。从立法价值导向分析,未来制度完善中应当构建起职务犯罪调查中的律师介入程序。同时,应基于监察体制改革政治功能导向,对律师介入调查的程序设计应作严格限定。In the context of the supervision system reform, the lawyer's involvement in the investigation process is a double-edged sword. On the one hand, the involvement of lawyers in the supervision investigation may lead to the obstruction of the investigation and investigation work, the evidence of the case is destroyed, and the corrupt elements escape the hidden dangers of the French law. On the other hand, the involvement of lawyers in monitoring investigations is not only compatible with the constitutional spirit and legislative spirit, but also has many benefits for the realization of human rights protection, the rights relief of respondents and the regulation of monitoring investigations. From the perspective of value analysis, lawyers should be allowed to intervene in the investigation process. However, based on the overall structure of the supervision system reform and the judicial context, reasonable limits should be imposed on the system design of lawyers involved in the investigation process.

关 键 词：职务犯罪调查程序 律师介入 价值分析 介入限度 制度建构 

分 类 号：D912.114[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]