从非正式交流中识别领域研究热点的适用性探索——以科学网博客为例  

Exploring the Applicability of Identifying Research Hotspot from Informal Communication Channels: Case Study of Blog in ScienceNet.cn

作　　者：徐呈呈 徐杰杰 李健[1] Xu Chengcheng;Xu Jiejie;Li Jian(College of Computer & Information Science, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715)

机构地区：[1]西南大学计算机与信息科学学院,重庆400715

出　　处：《情报探索》2019年第5期14-20,共7页Information Research

基　　金：四川省教育厅人文社会科学重点研究基地四川学术成果分析与应用研究中心资助项目"大数据环境下科学数据的引用行为研究"(项目编号:SCAA18-022)成果之一

摘　　要：[目的/意义]旨在为领域热点分析提供新的视角及方向。[方法/过程]以科学网图书情报学相关10群组博文标签词为数据源,采用高频标签词词频分析、高频标签词共现聚类分析、社会网络可视化分析等多种定量分析方法识别我国图书情报学领域的研究热点,并将结果与正式交流渠道的研究结果进行对比分析。[结果/结论]与正式交流渠道分析相比,非正式交流渠道角度分析呈现出非广泛性和非准确性两方面的不足,因此在进行领域研究热点分析时应以正式交流渠道的分析为主,非正式交流渠道的分析为辅。[Purpose/significance] The paper is to propose a new research perspective and research direction for research hotspot analysis.[Method/process] The paper takes 10 relevant grouped blogs of Library and Information Science in ScienceNet.cn as data resources, uses high frequency tag word frequency analysis, high frequency tag word co-occurrence cluster analysis, social network visualization analysis and other quantitative analysis methods to identify research hotspots in the field of library and information science, and compares the results with the research results of formal communication channels.[Result/conclusion] Through comparative analysis, it is found that analysis from informal communication channels presents shortcomings like non-widespread and inaccuracy. So while doing research hotspot analysis, it should focus on formal communication channels, together with analysis of informal communication channels.

关 键 词：标签词 学术博客 图书情报学 非正式交流渠道 信息计量 研究热点 

分 类 号：G353.1[文化科学—情报学]