检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邵培樟 梁美英 Shao Peizhang;Liang Meiying
机构地区:[1]浙江财经大学东方学院法政分院 [2]浙江财经大学东方学院法律系
出 处:《台湾研究》2019年第2期75-84,共10页Taiwan Studies
基 金:2016年浙江省哲学社会科学规划"涉台专项"课题<多元化纠纷解决理念下的涉台仲裁制度创新研究:基于在浙台商权益保护的视角>(编号:16STYJ003YB)的阶段性成果
摘 要:仲裁兼具自主性、保密性、专业性、经济性、民间性和终局性等优势,理应成为解决涉台投资纠纷的最佳选择,但实践中仲裁并未成为当事人解决涉台投资纠纷的首选方式。为保护台商合法权益,促进两岸投资贸易的进一步发展,应以多元化纠纷解决理念为指引创新涉台仲裁制度。首先,针对仲裁前案源被"限流"和"分流",多管齐下,扩大案件来源;其次,在仲裁过程中创新机制,凸显仲裁的自身特色与价值;最后,增强仲裁后的保障,规制涉台仲裁的司法监督,以打消当事人对仲裁裁决认可与执行的顾虑。With the advantages of high party-autonomy,confidential,professional,economical,nongovernmental and definitive,arbitration is supposed to be the best choice for resolving Taiwan-related investment disputes.However,it has not become the parties’first choice in practice.In order to protect the legitimate rights and interests of Taiwan Residents businessmen and promote the further development of cross-strait investment trade,it is necessary to carry out innovative research on the Taiwan-related arbitration system under the guidance of diversified dispute settlement concept.First,for the source of cases is restricted and shunt before arbitrating,take a multi-channel approach to expand the source of cases.Second,innovate mechanism in the process of arbitration to highlight the characteristics and value of arbitration.Finally,enhance the protection of post-arbitration and regulate the judicial supervision of Taiwan-related arbitration for the purpose of dispelling the parties’misgivings about the recognition and implementation of the arbitration award.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.60