检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:林晓炜 周东平[1] LIN Xiao-wei;ZHOU Dong-ping(School of law,Xiamen University,Xiamen Fujian,361000)
出 处:《山西大同大学学报(社会科学版)》2019年第2期19-23,38,共6页Journal of Shanxi Datong University(Social Science Edition)
摘 要:死刑复核制度的形成与演变有着极为深刻的社会历史根源。唐代是中国古代死刑复核制度的成熟期,其法律规定之细密、复核程序之严密,都大大超过了以往的朝代。唐代立法者从复审和复奏两方面严格规范了死刑复核程序,在制度设计上具有开创性、复核形式具有科学性,同时在制度的适用上面也有例外。为了我国刑事审判与执行程序在今后的改革与发展,对唐代死刑复核制度的内容、思想的研究非常必要。The formation and evolution of death penalty review system has profound social and historical roots.The Tang Dynasty was a mature period for the review of the death penalty in ancient China,with its detailed law and strict review procedure,which greatly exceeded the previous dynasties.The legislators in the Tang Dynasty strictly regulate the procedure of death penalty review by reexamination and replay,which are scientific and innovative in system design,while there is also exception in the application of the system.The in-depth study of the contents and thoughts of the death penalty review system in Tang Dynasty will provide an important reference for the future reform and development of the criminal justice and execution procedures in our country.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.188