两种樟子松球果象甲防治技术的对比分析  

Comparation of two control techniques of Pissodes validirostris Gyll

作　　者：曾健勇[1] 张方明 林连男[1] 葛玉祥 杨璟 张国财[1] ZENG Jianyong(School of Forest,Northeast Forestry University,Harbin 150040,China)

机构地区：[1]东北林业大学林学院,黑龙江哈尔滨150040 [2]呼伦贝尔市红花尔基林业局,内蒙古呼伦贝尔021112

出　　处：《中国森林病虫》2019年第3期32-35,共4页Forest Pest and Disease

基　　金：中央高校基本科研业务费专项(2572017AA18);中央财政林业科技推广示范资金项目(JLT[2016]13);哈尔滨市应用技术研究与开发项目(2016RAXXJ035)

摘　　要：在红花尔基采用天敌曲姬蜂和烟碱·苦参碱烟剂进行樟子松球果象甲Pissodes validirostris Gyll防治试验,对两种樟子松球果象甲防治技术的经济投入、人力投入、物资投入以及防治效果进行对比分析。2014—2015年连续2 a人工助迁曲姬蜂防治樟子松球果象甲,2015年采用烟碱·苦参碱烟剂防治樟子松球果象甲,2种防治方法均取得良好的防治效果。烟剂防治人力与资金投入明显大于曲姬蜂防治,但烟剂防治的速效性明显优于曲姬蜂防治。Control tests were carried out in Honghuaerji to compare economic input,human input,material input and control effect about the natural enemy control and smoke agent control against Pissodes validirostris Gyll.The natural enemy control was lasted from 2014 to 2015,and Scambus spp.was employed as the parasitoid for natural enemy control here,a nicotine - matrine smoke agent control test was carried out in 2015.We found the natural enemy control and smoke agent control obtained good effect.The smoke agent control was obviously larger than the natural enemy control at human input and economic input,but urgency effect of the smoke agent control was obviously better than the natural enemy control.

关 键 词：樟子松球果象甲 曲姬蜂 烟碱·苦参碱 生物防治 烟雾剂防治 

分 类 号：S763.3[农业科学—森林保护学]