检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡晶晶 HU Jing-jing
机构地区:[1]西南政法大学
出 处:《北方法学》2019年第3期29-40,共12页Northern Legal Science
摘 要:体育赛事实况转播侵权问题日益凸显,该问题的实质在于对"信号"的盗窃。相关侵权案件倾向于著作权法保护模式,但该模式仅能解决"重播画面"侵权问题,而无法处理实况转播侵权问题,因为"信号"既非作品,也并非广播组织权的客体。体育赛事转播权属于具有绝对权属性的民事权益,属于我国一般侵权行为的保护范围。盗窃信号的行为因致使权利人利益受损,而可作为一般侵权行为来规制。然而,囿于"禁止向一般条款逃逸"原则,当盗窃信号构成不正当竞争行为时则排除一般侵权行为条款的适用,而应适用反不正当竞争法。The problem of infringing sports events broadcasting right is becoming increasingly prominent. The essence of the problem lies in the theft of "signals". The related infringement cases are inclined to the copyright law protection model,but the model only solves the problem of "replay picture",not the problem of live broadcast infringement,because the"signal"is neither the work nor the object of the broadcasting right. The sports events broadcasting right is the civil right with the property of absolute rights,thus belongs to the protection scope of general tort in China. The act of stealing signals damages the interests of the right holder,and can be regulated as general tort. However,limited to the principle of "prohibiting the escape to general terms",when the theft of signal constitutes an unfair competition,the application of general tort clauses is excluded,and the anti-unfair competition law should be applied.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43