套路贷案件研究——以M院案例为基准实证分析  

Research into the Case of Tricky Loans——Take the Case Tried by a Certain Procuratorate as a Benchmark for Empirical Analysis

作　　者：上海市闵行区人民检察院课题组 张晨[1] 胡智强[2] 崔苗 肖瑜 孔庆丹 欧阳铭怡[4] Research Group of People′s Procuratorate of Minhang District(People's Procuratorate of Minhang District,Shanghai 201199,China)

机构地区：[1]上海市闵行区人民检察院,上海201199 [2]上海市闵行区人民检察院检察三部 [3]上海市闵行区人民检察院检察二部 [4]上海市闵行区人民检察院检察一部

出　　处：《公安理论与实践（上海公安高等专科学校学报）》2019年第2期44-54,共11页Journal of Shanghai Police College

摘　　要：套路贷案件是近年来新兴的犯罪,相应判例较少,且存在多个罪名交织、刑民交错、案情疑难复杂,取证难、新情况与新问题不断等特点。因而对此类案件进行研究无论是在法律层面还是在民生层面都具有重大意义。为此,有必要对套路贷案件的定性争议、罪名辨析、法律适用等方面进行了剖析,并结合套路贷案件办理过程中的难点,从证据审查、量刑幅度等方面进行分析研究,以期对今后套路贷案件的办理提供帮助,并对套路贷案件的预防和规制提出建议。The tricky loan is a new crime in recent years so judicial precedents of this kind are comparatively scarce. What’s more, in the process of trial, it has such characteristics as accusation for several crimes, interconnection between Criminal Law and Civil Law, complexity, difficulty of collecting evidence and frequent emergence of new circumstances and problems. Accordingly, it is significant in terms of law and livelihood to conduct research into such cases. It is necessary to analyze controversy of conviction, legal applicability and etc. by referring to puzzles of writers’ handling such cases, examining evidences, range of conviction and etc, which is hoped to help counterparts in handling such cases in the future and to offer suggestions for prevention and control of the case.

关 键 词：套路贷 高利贷 实证分析 诈骗罪 敲诈勒索罪 虚假诉讼罪 

分 类 号：D631[政治法律—政治学]