互联网平台经济下地方立法边界的重构——以网约车立法为例  

Reconstruction of the Boundary of Local Legislation in the Era of Internet Platform Economy:the Example of Local Legislation of Online Car Hailing

作　　者：张效羽 Zhang Xiaoyu

机构地区：[1]中共中央党校(国家行政学院)政法教研部 [2]国家行政学院行政法研究中心

出　　处：《地方立法研究》2019年第3期19-30,共12页Local Legislation Journal

基　　金：中国法学会2017年部级课题"共享经济的行政法规制研究:实验性规制的进路"(课题编号CLS[2017]D32);司法部2017年度国家法治与法学理论研究项目<基于成本收益分析的网约车法律规制研究>(17SFB3013);国家行政学院2018年科研课题"网络强国建设的法治保障研究"的成果之一

摘　　要：在互联网平台经济时代,基于互联网平台经济的地域无界性、资源聚集性和网络外部性等特征,互联网平台经济对各地传统行业的既得利益冲击较大,易于激发地方保护主义立法。同时,互联网平台经济的属性决定了其遭受地方保护主义的损害更大。为此,应当推动地方立法边界的重构,提升针对互联网平台经济相关事宜的立法层级,明确有关互联网平台经济相关资质和资格的立法应当由中央立法机关实施,将涉及互联网平台经济基本规则的行政立法提升至由省级以上行政立法机关实施。设区的市地方立法只应当就互联网平台经济在本地面临的特殊情形进行配套立法。In the era of Internet platform economy, based on the inherent geographical boundlessness,the Internet platform giants could gather resources and have significant negative impact on local traditional small and medium-sized enterprises. The Internet platform giants have inspired local protectionism, which has done great harm to the Internet platform economy. Under these circumstances, we should reconsider the boundaries local legislation in this area. We should upgrade the legislative level of Internet platform economy-related matters. Legislations on Internet platform economy-related qualifications and qualifications themselves should be retained by the central legislation. Administrative legislation related to Internet platform economy should be granted to the provincial level or above the provincial level. Local legislation of cities with districts could only provide rules on the special situation of Internet platform economy.

关 键 词：互联网平台经济 地方立法 网约车 中央和地方关系 

分 类 号：D927[政治法律—法学] D922.296