宋校《金匮要略方论》与《千金要方》相应方剂考证  

Textual Research of Prescriptions Simultaneously Recorded in Song's Edition of Elaboration of Prescriptions in Synopsis of the Golden Chamber and Invaluable Prescriptions

作　　者：曾凤[1] 林彬[2] ZENG Feng;LIN Bin(Beijing University of Chinese Medicine,Beijing 100029,China;Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine,Guangzhou 510006 Guangdong,China)

机构地区：[1]北京中医药大学,北京100029 [2]广州中医药大学,广东广州510006

出　　处：《广州中医药大学学报》2019年第6期916-919,共4页Journal of Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine

基　　金：北京中医药大学国学院课题项目(编号:2120044310016)

摘　　要：通过宋校《金匮要略方论》与宋校《千金要方》的对校研究,发现两书相应方剂的具体内容在剂量及煎服法、药物计量单位、药物加减等方面存在不同程度的差异。这些差异提示:一是对宋校医书的严谨性、可靠性不宜盲信、盲从;二是要对宋校医书的引用文献及引用方式等基本问题进行深入研究,正确理解、有效利用文本内容;三是由于中医药传承发展的基础性著作《黄帝内经素问》与《伤寒论》等书皆由宋人整理刊行,对宋校医书特点的深入探讨应成为当今中医文献研究的重要课题。By comparing the edition of Elaboration of Prescriptions in Synopsis of the Golden Chamber(Jin Kui Yao Lue Fang Lun)and Invaluable Prescriptions(Qian Jin Yao Fang)collated in Song Dynasty,we found that there existed various degrees of differences in the dosage, decocting methods, dosage measurement, herbal modification of the prescriptions simultaneously recorded in the above two monographs. These differences shed light on the following issues:first of all,we should be cautious about the conscientiousness and reliability of Song’s edition of medical literature;secondly,profound research on the cited literature and the methods of citation of Song’s edition of medical literature will be needed for ensuring the proper usage of these books;finally,for the classic Chinese medicine literatures such as Plain Questions of Huangdi’s Cannon of Medicine(Huang Di Nei Jing Su Wen)and Treatise on Exogenous Febrile Diseases(Shang Han Lun)had been edited,collated and issued by Song’s scholars,a profound investigation of the characteristics of Song’s edition of medical books should be an important topic in the present research field of Chinese medicine literature.

关 键 词：宋校 《金匮要略方论》 《千金要方》 方剂 

分 类 号：R289.3[医药卫生—方剂学]