检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡倩倩[1] 朱鸣[2] 陈萍萍[2] 史平[1] Hu Qianqian;Zhu Ming;Chen Pingping;Shi Ping(Nursing School,Huzhou University,Huzhou 313000,China)
机构地区:[1]湖州师范学院护理学院,浙江湖州313000 [2]湖州市第一人民医院肾内科
出 处:《护理学杂志》2019年第9期5-7,共3页Journal of Nursing Science
摘 要:目的探讨感恩干预对维持性血液透析患者自我感受负担的影响。方法将82例血液透析患者按透析时间分为对照组和观察组各40例;对照组实施常规护理,观察组在常规护理基础上实施感恩干预,持续12周。干预前后采用感恩问卷和自我感受负担量表进行调查。结果干预后观察组自我感受负担总分25.10±4.88,感恩得分为32.08±2.41,对照组分别为37.52±2.44、16.15±2.15,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(均P<0.01)。结论对维持性血液透析患者开展感恩干预,可降低其自我感受负担,提高感恩水平。Objective To explore the effect of gratitude intervention on self-perceived burden of maintenance hemodialysis patients.Methods Totally 82 hemodialysis patients were divided into a control group and an observation group chronologically, with 40 patients in each group. The control group received routine nursing, while the observation group additionally received gratitude intervention for 12 weeks.The Gratitude Questionnaire-6(GQ-6) and Self-Perceived Burden Scale(SPBS) were utilized to investigate the two groups before and after the intervention.Results After the intervention, the total SPBS score of the observation group was 25.10±4.88, GQ-6 score was 32.08±2.41, versus 37.52±2.44 and 16.15±2.15 respectively in the control group, and there were significant differences between the two groups(P<0.01 for both).Conclusion The gratitude intervention for maintenance hemodialysis patients could reduce patients′ self-perceived burden, and improve their gratitude level.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.62