检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:万志鹏[1] WAN Zhi-peng(Faculty of Law,Xiangtan University,Xiangtan,Hunan 411105,China)
出 处:《湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2019年第3期72-76,共5页Journal of Xiangtan University:Philosophy And Social Sciences
基 金:教育部人文社科规划基金项目"军事犯罪中死刑罪名削减研究"(16YJA820014);湖南省教育厅重点研究项目"战争与武装冲突法的发展对我国军事刑法的影响"(15A187)阶段性成果
摘 要:构建完善的军事法体系是实现军事法治的必要前提。我国军事刑法长期未获得修订和完善,其中的军事死刑数量过多,虚置严重,已成为我国死刑改革需要面对的重点问题。各国军事刑法废除死刑的趋势表明,即使军事犯罪有特殊危害,但军事死刑也已经失去正当化根据。废止军事死刑符合法治的基本理念,适应刑法的人道主义要求,与军法从严的原则并不矛盾。未来我国应依照从平时到战时、从非暴力到暴力、从无直接被害人到有直接被害人犯罪的顺序有步骤、分阶段地推进军事死刑的废止。It’s necessary to construct a perfect military law system for realizing military governance by law.However,China’s military criminal law has not been revised and improved for a long time.The excessive numbers of military death penalty and its serious vacancy have become the key issues that hinder China’s death penalty reform.The trend of abolishing death penalty in military criminal law in various countries shows that military death penalty has lost its legitimate basis even though military crimes have special harm.The abolition of military death penalty meets the requirements of the basic concept of governance by law and the humanitarian requirements of criminal law.It does not contradict with the principle of strict military law.In the future,China should promote the abolition of military death penalty step by step according to the sequence from peacetime to wartime,from non-violence to violence,from no direct victim to crime of direct victim.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49