商业秘密法律保护:困境、路径选择  

On Legal Protection of Trade Secrets: Dilemma and Path Choice

作　　者：倪明 Ni Ming(School of Law,Tongling University,Tongling 244000,China)

机构地区：[1]铜陵学院法学院

出　　处：《黑河学院学报》2019年第4期34-35,41,共3页Journal of Heihe University

基　　金：安徽省教育厅高校人文社会科学重点研究基地项目;安徽大学经济法制研究中心2018年高校科学研究项目“商业秘密司法保护研究”(SK2018A0045)

摘　　要：2018年实施的《民法总则》首次将商业信息秘密纳入知识产权客体予以保护。而今年实施的《反不正当竞争法》更是针对商业秘密做了进一步修订:新增了商业秘密侵权主体类别和侵权方式,并进一步明确商业信息秘密的范畴。《反不正当竞争法》是我国商业秘密法律保护的主要渊源。《反不正当竞争法》和《反垄断法》虽然都是规范市场竞争行为的,但是二者的规制目的并不相同。《反垄断法》是公法的典型,解决垄断问题,为规制竞争不足,常常主动执法干预。《反不正当竞争法》以国家机关执法介入为相应补充,相对私力救济性更强。The General Principles of Civil Law implemented in 2018 incorporate business information secrets into the object of intellectual property and offer the protect for the first time.Anti-Unfair Competition Law implemented this year has been further revised the law of business secrets:adding the category of infringement and the infringement method regarding trade secrets,and further clarifying the scope of commercial information secrets.Anti-Unfair Competition Law is viewed as the main source of legal protection regarding trade secrets in China.Anti-Unfair Competition Law and the Anti-Monopoly Law both regulate market competition behaviors with different the regulatory purposes.Anti-Monopoly Law is a typical example of public law for addressing the problem of arbitrage,and quite often takes the initiative to intervene for regulating limitations in competition.Anti-Unfair Competition Law is supplemented by the law enforcement intervention from state organs,thus having relatively strong remediality in private power is.

关 键 词：消极信息 商业秘密法 商秘专职管家 价值 

分 类 号：D922.294[政治法律—经济法学]