报应主义正当性之哲学思考——基于观念论与规范论双重进路  

Philosophical Thinking on the Legitimacy of Retributivism ——Based on the Conceptive and Normative Approaches

作　　者：邵博文[1] Shao Bowen(Peking University Law School,Beijing 100871)

机构地区：[1]北京大学法学院,北京100871

出　　处：《河南财经政法大学学报》2019年第3期115-126,共12页Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law

基　　金：国家哲学社会科学基金重大项目"我国刑法修正的理论模型与制度实践研究"之子课题三"我国刑法修正的理论模型建构问题研究"的阶段性成果(项目编号:16ZDA061)

摘　　要：刑罚的证立由其正当性根据推导而来,而刑罚正当性无关乎"目的"。法治国建构需要"契约""交换""互动"和"批判"等意识的正向推动。正义是刑罚正当性的观念性根基,报应主义则是刑事正义的规范化表达。不仅全部预防理论无法充足刑事正义的要求,且各种综合主义理论也同样难以成为证成刑罚正当的理据。The testimony of the penalty is derived from its justification,and the legitimacy of the penalty is irrelevant to its “purpose.” The construction of Rechtsstaat(law state) requires the positive promotion of consciousness such as “contractive”,“exchangeable ”,“interactive” and “critical”.Justice is the conceptual foundation of the legitimacy of punishment,just as retributivism is the standardized expression of criminal justice.Not only can all preventive theories fail to meet the requirements of criminal justice,but various comprehensive theories are equally difficult to justify the justification of punishment.

关 键 词：刑罚 正当性 目的 报应主义 综合论 

分 类 号：D924[政治法律—刑法学]