检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王鑫磊[1] Wang XinLei
机构地区:[1]长春理工大学法学院
出 处:《珠江论丛》2019年第1期197-207,共11页Pearl River Forum
摘 要:行贿罪和受贿罪,均应受到法律制裁,以保证国家公务人员的廉洁性。通过刑事立法有效规制贿赂犯罪,是世界各国普遍面临的刑法难题。在对受贿犯罪研究不断深入的同时,应当进一步重视和深化对于行贿犯罪的研究。日本刑事立法的现代化早于中国,日本刑法对于行贿犯罪的规定比较明确。中日两国刑法关于行贿犯罪的规定既有共性也有各自特点,对行贿犯罪的贿赂范围和主观构成要件要素的规定具有一定差异。通过比较两国立法和司法实践上的差异,可以为中国行贿犯罪立法的完善,提供有价值的参照与借鉴。Both the crime of bribery and the crime of accepting bribes should be punished by law in order to ensure the integrity of public servants.Effective regulation of bribery crime through criminal legislation is a common problem in criminal law all over the world.While the study of the crime of accepting bribes is deepening,we should pay more attention to and deepen the research on bribery crime.The modernization of Japanese criminal legislation was earlier than that of China,and the provisions of Japanese criminal law on the crime of bribery were relatively clear.The provisions of the criminal law of China and Japan on bribery crime have their own characteristics as well as common ones,and there are certain differences in the scope of bribery and the essential factors of subjective elements of bribery crime.By comparing the differences in legislation and judicial practice between the two countries,we can provide valuable reference for the perfection of legislation on bribery crime in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7