知识产权案件越级上诉程序构造论——《关于知识产权法庭若干问题的规定》第2条的法教义学分析  

On the Construction of the Intellectual Property Case Leapfrog Appeal Procedure:Analysis of the Jurisprudence of Article 2 of the Provisions on Several Issues of the Intellectual Property Court

作　　者：毋爱斌[1,2] 苟应鹏 Wu Aibin;Gou Yingpeng

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学 [2]西南政法大学人民法庭研究中心

出　　处：《知识产权》2019年第5期25-36,共12页Intellectual Property

基　　金：2018年重庆市教育委员会人文社会科学研究项目"人民法庭制度现代转型研究"(项目编号:18SKD003)的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：在国家层面确立专利等知识产权案件"越级上诉"无疑是知识产权司法保护史上具有里程碑意义的一次变革,但相关司法解释确定的仅仅是粗疏的越级上诉规则,亟需以法教义学为基础进行合理解读与"补丁式立法"。缘于审级制度的差异,我国的越级上诉与域外之"飞跃上诉"存在本质上的不同。越级上诉的合法要件包括有法定的越级上诉对象、上诉人应具有越级上诉利益、符合法定的越级上诉程序三项。而对于越级上诉案件的审理,知识产权法庭则应将精力放在法律问题的解决上,主要审查法律适用是否合法。在此基础上,对于越级上诉的裁判主要包括以不合法裁定驳回,裁定撤销原判、发回重审,以无理由驳回,以有理由撤销原判并自行改判四种。It is a landmark change in the history of IP judicial protection to establish the IP cases, including patent cases, leapfrog appeal procedure at the national level. However, the relevant judicial interpretations only de fine the crude leapfrog appeal rules. There is an urgent need for reasonable interpretation and patching legislation on the basis of doctrine of law. Due to the di fferences in the trial grade system, there is a fundamental di fference between the leapfrog appeals in China and that outside China. The legal requirements for a leapfrog appeal include a statutory leapfrog appeal, the appellant possessing a leapfrog appeal interest, and the leapfrog appeal procedure being legitimate. In trialing leapfrog appeal cases, the intellectual property court should engage legal review. On the basis, the judgement for the leapfrog appeal cases fall into four categories: dismissal due to unlawful ruling;remanding for retrial;dismissal for insu fficient justi fication;and revoking the original judgment on reasonable ground for amendment.

关 键 词：最高人民法院 知识产权法庭 越级上诉 法律审 

分 类 号：D923.4[政治法律—民商法学]