检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴晓霞 关海庭[2] Wu Xiaoxia;Guan Haiting(Guangxi Normal University,Guilin Guangxi 541004;Peking University,Beijing 100871)
机构地区:[1]广西师范大学,广西桂林541004 [2]北京大学,北京100871
出 处:《天津行政学院学报》2019年第3期11-17,共7页Journal of Tianjin Administration Institute
基 金:广西哲学社会科学青年项目“协商民主视域下广西城市基层治理转型研究”(15CZZ001);广西特聘专家项目“广西地方治理与民族法制建设研究”
摘 要:探究中国基层协商治理的内生性演化逻辑是实现治理话语从西方到中国转换的关键。中国基层协商治理的内生性发展与其历史进程中的特有观念体系紧密关联,儒家的宗族文化、乡绅文化与和合文化共同作用形成的功能耦合网为协商治理在传统基层社会的有效运行构筑了扎实的观念基础,也形成了协商治理背后独特的国家与社会关系。国家与社会关系的变化是治理变迁动力激发的本质因素,国家与社会关系的重构使得协商治理在当代中国获得了重要的制度生长点。中国语境下的路径依赖关系导致当前基层协商治理只能采取正式协商制度安排与非正式权力运行并存的方式,两者之间的博弈在客观上决定了当代中国基层协商治理只能以渐进、内生的方式进行制度创新的最终走向。Exploring the endogenous evolutionary logic of the deliberative governance in the grass roots of China is the key to realize the theoretical transformation of governance from West to China.The coupling functional network produced by the joint work of clan culture,gentry culture and convergeology culture in Confucianism provides the conceptual foundation for the effective operation of deliberative governance in the traditional grassroots society,forming unique state and social relationship.Thus the transition of state and social relationship is the driving force of governance changes,and the refactoring of state and social relationship makes deliberative governance possess growing spot in the institution.However,path dependence in Chinese context leads to the method combination of formal institutional arrangement and informal power process in the deliberative governance in the grassroots society in China at present,and also the game situation between formal institution and informal power decides the direction of institution innovation in endogenous and gradual manner.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28