我国体育纠纷解决“或裁或审”制度研究  

A study of the “arbitration or litigation” sports dispute settlement system in China

作　　者：姜熙[1] 王家宏[2] 谭小勇[1] JIANG Xi;WANG Jia-hong;TAN Xiao-yong(Sports Law Center,Shanghai University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 201701,China;Jiangsu Sports Industry and Health Research Institute,Soochow University,Suzhou 215021,China)

机构地区：[1]上海政法学院体育法学研究中心,上海201701 [2]苏州大学体育健康产业研究院,江苏苏州215021

出　　处：《体育学刊》2019年第3期58-64,共7页Journal of Physical Education

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目“国际体育仲裁院仲裁案例研究与裁判要旨通纂”(1986-2016)(18BTY071);国家社科基金重大项目“中国体育深化改革重大问题的法律研究”(16ZDA225)

摘　　要：中国体育法治建设中一项至关重要的任务就是建立起包括调解、仲裁、诉讼在内的多元体育纠纷解决体系。运用文献资料研究、比较、案例分析等方法,对《体育法》第三十三条没有落实所造成的当前我国体育纠纷解决困境进行分析,重点对我国体育纠纷解决制度建立的目标、制度安排进行论证。研究认为,建立多元、开放、高效、公正,尊重各纠纷主体选择权的多元化体育纠纷解决体系是新时代我国体育纠纷解决制度建设的目标;在“只审不裁”“只裁不审”“先裁后审”“或裁或审”4种纠纷解决制度安排中,“或裁或审”机制应该成为首先方案。A crucial task in Chinese sports legal governance construction is to establish a mediation,arbitration and litigation included multifunctional sports dispute settlement system.By applying methods such as literature data study,comparison and case analysis,the authors analyzed the current Chinese sports dispute settlement predicament caused by failure to implement article 33 in the Sports Law,mainly analyzed and demonstrated the objective and system arrangements of Chinese sports dispute settlement system establishment,and drew the following conclusions:establishing a multifunctional,open,highly efficient,fair and various dispute subject options respected mul-tifunctional sports dispute settlement system is the objective of Chinese sports dispute settlement system construc-tion in the new era;among such 4 dispute settlement system arrangements as“litigation but no arbitration”,“arbitration but no litigation”,“arbitration and then litigation”and“arbitration or litigation”,the“arbitration or litigation”mechanism should become the first option.

关 键 词：体育法 体育纠纷 体育仲裁 体育法治 

分 类 号：G80-05[文化科学—运动人体科学]