情境信息还是公正世界信念?——影响司法公正感的两条路径  

Contextual Information or Belief in a Just World? ——Two Influential Paths on Perception of Judicial Justice

作　　者：杨宇琦 伍麟[1] YANG Yu-qi;WU Lin(Department of Sociology,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072,China)

机构地区：[1]武汉大学社会学系,湖北武汉430072

出　　处：《西南交通大学学报（社会科学版）》2019年第3期123-131,共9页Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University(Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大研究专项项目"加强社会心理服务体系建设"(18VZL009)

摘　　要：司法公正感是个体对司法秩序的基本感受,同时受情境信息与公正世界信念的影响,研究司法公正感能为建设法治社会的心理基础提供更多启示。采用2(被试内设计,身份角色:受害者vs.加害者)×2(被试间设计,信息形式:具体vs.抽象)×2(被试间设计,公正世界信念:高水平vs.低水平)的三因素混合设计开展研究,探究情境信息与公正世界信念对司法公正感的影响方式。研究发现身份角色、公正世界信念对司法公正感的影响显著,且身份角色对其影响效应最大,信息形式对司法公正感的影响边缘显著,身份角色与信息形式存在交互效应,但是均不与公正世界信念产生交互效应。总体而言,情境信息与公正世界信念对司法公正感的影响相对独立。Perception of Judicial Justice(PJJ)is individual’s fundamental sensation on judicial order,affected by both contextual information and Belief in a Just World(BJW).Studies on PJJ can provide more information and enlightenment on psychological foundation of building the society ruled by law.This study adopts a 2 RO(within-subjects design,Role:victim vs.offender)×2 IF(betweensubject design,Information Form:concrete information vs.abstract information)×2 BJW(betweensubject design,BJW:high vs.low)mixed experimental design to investigate how contextual information and BJW influence PJJ.The results demonstrate RO and BJW have a significant impact on PJJ,while IF just has a marginal significant one.Additionally,RO has the most influential effect on PJJ.Furthermore,it is notable that a remarkable two-way interaction between RO and IF is found,while no interactive effect is found between BJW and any other contextual variables.In general,contextual information and BJW are two relatively independent factors that influence on PJJ.

关 键 词：司法公正感 受害者 加害者 具体性 抽象性 公正世界信念 

分 类 号：B848.4[哲学宗教—心理学] C912.6[经济管理]