作为行政自制手段的区域限批:性质判断与司法控制  

Regional Restrictions on Environmental Impact Assessment Approval as Administrative Self-Restraint:The Legal Nature and Judicial Control

作　　者：尹婷[1] YIN Ting(Law School of Peking University, Beijing, 100871)

机构地区：[1]北京大学法学院

出　　处：《行政法学研究》2019年第3期112-122,共11页ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目"公法争议与公法救济研究"(16JJD820001)

摘　　要：《环境保护法》确立了以总量控制为目的的区域限批制度,突破了建设项目环评审批权在行政组织内部的原始分配。赋予省级以上环境保护主管部门启动区域限批的权力,实质上是授权其在特定情况下对下级环境保护主管部门的行政许可实施权进行限制。区域限批决定在性质上属于内部行为,同时由于其可能影响相对人依法取得行政许可的权利,法院可以在对相应的行政许可实施行为的诉讼中审查区域限批决定的合法性。根据法律保留原则,规范性文件不能超出立法授权的目的、范围增设限批情形。而直接依据立法上的区域限批条款作出的限批决定也要接受比例原则的检验。According to environment protection law,the regional restriction on EIA approval serves as a supporting system of the pollutant total amount control system.It adjusts the allocation of administrative license power.The nature of regional restrictions is to restrict local authority’s license power, which is internal behavior rather than administrative action.The court can examine the legality of regional restrictions in the process of judicial review of related administrative action.The regional restriction should be regulated by the principle of legal reservation and the principle of proportionality.

关 键 词：区域限批 内部行为 法律保留原则 比例原则 

分 类 号：D922.68[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]