检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵晨[1] 姜申君 ZHAO Chen;JIANG Shenjun(National Key Research Center for Linguistics and Applied Linguistics,Guangdong University of Foreign Studies,Guangzhou 510420,China;Faculty of English Language and Culture,Guangdong University of Foreign Studies,Guangzhou 510420,China)
机构地区:[1]广东外语外贸大学双语认知与发展实验室/外国语言学及应用语言学研究中心,广东省广州市510420 [2]广东外语外贸大学英语语言文化学院,广东省广州市510420
出 处:《外语教学与研究》2019年第3期422-434,F0003,共14页Foreign Language Teaching and Research
基 金:广东外语外贸大学双语认知与发展实验室;广东外语外贸大学外国语言学及应用语言学研究中心资助
摘 要:本研究通过两个实验探讨了不同水平中国英语学习者在产出英语句子过程中概念结构与句法结构的互动关系。实验主要考察句法结构相同、但题元角色数量不同的两种启动句(非限定性宾语提升句与宾语控制句)是否影响受试将目标句(限定性宾语提升句)回述成不定式形式。结果表明,与控制句相比,低水平学习者倾向将目标句回述成限定形式,而高水平学习者倾向将目标句回述成不定式形式。这表明二语习得者的二语产出是一个动态发展的过程,这种发展过程符合基于用法的理论模型。Two experiments are conducted to explore the relationship between conceptual structures and syntactic structures in L2 complex sentence production.Two types of primes which are similar in syntactic structures but different in the number of thematic roles(object raising sentences with infinite complements and object control sentences)were adopted to test whether an additional conceptual role would prime the participants to recall the target sentences(object raising sentences with finite complements)as infinitive complements.The results showed that the high proficiency learners tended to recall the finite complements of object-raising verbs as infinitive complements,the low proficiency learners,however,recall the infinitive complements as finite ones.The differences are discussed in terms of usage-based theories.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43