检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王进辉 马文泽[1] 李文成[1] WANG Jinhui;MA Wenze;LI Wencheng(Department of Orthopedics,Tianjin Port Hospital,Tianjin 300456,China)
机构地区:[1]天津港口医院骨科
出 处:《继续医学教育》2019年第5期91-92,共2页Continuing Medical Education
摘 要:目的研究内固定联合外固定治疗不稳定性骨盆骨折临床疗效。方法选取2013年7月-2018年1月医院收治的78例不稳定性骨盆骨折患者为研究对象,根据手术方式随机将其分为对照组和观察组各39例。对对照组患者行内固定方式,对观察组患者采用内、外联合固定方式。比较两组术后临床疗效和手术并发症发生情况。结果观察组的优良率高于对照组(P<0.05);观察组患者并发症总发生率(5.13%)低于对照组(20.51%)(P<0.05)。结论内、外联合固定方式治疗不稳定性骨盆骨折临床疗效更佳,并发症的发生率低。Objective To study the clinical efficacy of internal fixation combined with external fixation in the treatment of unstable pelvic fractures. Methods 78 patients with unstable pelvic fractures admitted to our hospital from July 2013 to January 2018 were randomly divided into control group and observation group, with 39 patients in each group. The control group was treated with internal fixation while the observation group was treated with internal fixation combined with external fixation. The postoperative clinical effect and surgical complications were compared between two groups. Results The excellence rate of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group(P < 0.05). The total complication rate of the observation group(5.13%) was significantly lowerthan the control group(20.51%, P < 0.05).Conclusion The treatment of unstable pelvic fractures by combination of internal and external fixation has better clinical efficacy and lower incidence of complications.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.90