检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:韩哲 Han Zhe(Hubei Institute of Sport Science, Wuhan 432025, Hubei, China)
机构地区:[1]湖北省体育科学研究所
出 处:《体育科技文献通报》2019年第6期56-57,共2页Bulletin of Sport Science & Technology
摘 要:本文以湖北田径接力队为例,主要运用专家访谈法、录像统计法、数理统计法等方法。通过深入对比分析天津全运会国家队和湖北队男子4×100米接力技术,找出湖北队在此项目上存在的差距与不足,以期为湖北队乃至国家队接力水平的进一步提升提供理论参考和数据支持。研究结论:(1)湖北队的个人能力整体差于国家队,其中第一棒和第四棒最为明显。(2)湖北队只有第一交接区时间在2秒内,表明湖北队交接棒效率明显不如国家队好。(3)湖北队交接棒位置较国家队更接近于最佳位置区域,但均未达到最佳交接棒区域内。Taking Hubei Track team as an example and mainly by means of expert interviews,video statistics,and mathematical statistics,this paper compares the skills of national and Hubei Men’s 4×100 m Relay Team on the Tianjin National Games,aiming to discover the weakness of Hubei Team,and provide a theoretical reference and data support to the further improvement on the relay performance of both teams. The results show that the individual abilities of athletes in Hubei Team are generally inferior to those in the National Team,of which the first leg and the fourth leg are the most obvious. Only the time of the first baton-handover area is controlled in 2 seconds in Hubei Team,indicating its efficiency is significantly lower than that of the National Team. The handover area of Hubei Team is closer to the best position compared with the National Team. Yet none of them have reached the best area.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49